Onu Law Firm – Intellectual Property Law
California Law Firm
Mitch Onu is the principal owner of The Onu Law Firm. His practice focuses on a diverse range of transactional and litigation matters involving intellectual property, employment, business and real estate matters. Mitch has extensive experience handling all aspects of business, intellectual property, real estate and employment litigation in administrative agencies, state and federal courts nationwide, including dispute resolution and jury trials.
Related listings
-
San Francisco Copyright Lawyers - Onu Law Firm
Law Firm Directory CaliforniaOur Firm has established a reputation for enforcing and protecting trademarks in the marketplace with enforcement actions in Federal and State courts throughout the United States as well as at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. San Francisco Trade...
-
Nezhad | Shayesteh - Sherman Oaks Litigation Attorneys
Law Firm Directory CaliforniaNezhad | Shayesteh is an experienced law firm representing clients who have been seriously wronged by the negligent, reckless or intentional conduct of another or who are involved in a business, employment or insurance dispute. Our attorneys ha...
-
Law Office of Caryn H. Nguyen - Irvine Personal Injury Attorney
Law Firm Directory CaliforniaThe Law Office of Caryn H. Nguyen provides a wide array of legal services for our clients. Attorney Caryn H. Nguyen has over fourteen years of experience as a general legal practitioner with a focus in personal injury claims, family law cases, busine...
USCIS to Begin Accepting Applications under the International Entrepreneur Rule
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it is taking steps to implement the International Entrepreneur Rule (IER), in accordance with a recent court decision.
Although the IER was published during the previous administration with an effective date of July 17, 2017, it did not take effect because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule on July 11, 2017, delaying the IER’s effective date until March 14, 2018. This delay rule was meant to give USCIS time to review the IER and, if necessary, to issue a rule proposing to remove the IER program regulations.
However, a Dec. 1, 2017, ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in National Venture Capital Association v. Duke vacated USCIS’ final rule to delay the effective date. The Dec. 1, 2017, court decision is a result of litigation filed in district court on Sept. 19, 2017, which challenged the delay rule.