Forte Law Group LLC
Connecticut Law Firm
Connecticut special education lawyer, Jeffrey Forte, of Forte Law Group is a special education attorney and child advocate representing children with special needs.
Related listings
-
Conway Stoughton LLC - West Hartford Attorneys
Law Firm Directory ConnecticutThe firm was founded in Hartford in 2003 by Matt Conway and Paul Stoughton, hockey teammates who had both practiced with larger law firms in Hartford. The firm represents a variety of insurance companies and their insureds, as well as businesses and ...
-
James S. Brewer, Attorney at Law
Law Firm Directory ConnecticutJames S. Brewer, Attorney at Law Attorney Jim Brewer has years of experience and success in Connecticut’s State and Federal Courts. Representing individual clients in civil and criminal litigation throughout the state with robust advocacy and s...
-
Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara, LLC
Law Firm Directory ConnecticutIvey, Barnum & O'Mara, LLC Ivey, Barnum & O'Mara was established in 1950 and is proud to be the oldest and largest Greenwich based law firm. With two offices located in Connecticut and New York City, their large law firm has the big resources...
USCIS to Begin Accepting Applications under the International Entrepreneur Rule
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced today it is taking steps to implement the International Entrepreneur Rule (IER), in accordance with a recent court decision.
Although the IER was published during the previous administration with an effective date of July 17, 2017, it did not take effect because the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued a final rule on July 11, 2017, delaying the IER’s effective date until March 14, 2018. This delay rule was meant to give USCIS time to review the IER and, if necessary, to issue a rule proposing to remove the IER program regulations.
However, a Dec. 1, 2017, ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in National Venture Capital Association v. Duke vacated USCIS’ final rule to delay the effective date. The Dec. 1, 2017, court decision is a result of litigation filed in district court on Sept. 19, 2017, which challenged the delay rule.